Within NSW UFOs
Are Pilot UFO Sightings Stronger Evidence?
Pilot reports draw attention because they can sometimes be checked against radar, weather and flight records.
On this page
- Why pilot testimony matters
- Sydney air corridors and observation traps
- What corroborating records add
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Pilot UFO sightings around Sydney matter because they sit at the point where witness testimony can sometimes be tested against aviation records. A pilot may be trained to judge distance, movement, weather and aircraft behaviour, but even trained observers can be misled by glare, converging traffic, balloons, drones, military activity, atmospheric effects or brief glimpses during high-workload phases of flight. In New South Wales, the question is therefore not simply “did a pilot see something?” but “what records exist around the sighting?”
The strongest Sydney-area cases are not proof of exotic craft. They are stronger than ordinary street-level sightings when they include air traffic control notes, radar traces, flight identifiers, weather context or safety responses such as diversions. They also reveal why Sydney’s air routes are an observation trap: busy skies produce more witnesses, more cross-checking opportunities and more ordinary objects that can look strange for a few seconds.
Why Pilot Testimony Matters
Pilot reports carry weight for three main reasons. First, pilots are trained to notice traffic, lights, relative motion and hazards. Secondly, they usually report from a known position, altitude and time. Thirdly, a sighting in controlled airspace can leave a paper trail through air traffic control, company reporting systems, safety databases or, in older cases, defence files.
That does not make pilots immune to error. A pilot in approach or climb is handling radio calls, navigation, traffic separation and aircraft configuration, often while looking through curved cockpit transparencies at lights against cloud, haze or darkness. A small object seen briefly at close range may be genuinely hazardous yet still impossible to identify afterwards. The Australian Transport Safety Bureau’s 2014 investigation of a near collision near Perth shows the point well: the crew saw a bright strobe on an unknown grey cylindrical object, took evasive action, and the ATSB treated it as a serious incident, but the object was still not conclusively identified. [ATSB]atsb.gov.auOpen source on atsb.gov.au.
For New South Wales, the value of pilot evidence is highest when it can be matched to records from Airservices Australia, the ATSB, Defence, airport operations or historic archives. Airservices’ WebTrak, for example, uses air traffic control secondary surveillance radar to display aircraft movements within 100 kilometres of major airports and up to 30,000 feet, while also linking those tracks to noise monitoring data. That sort of infrastructure does not solve every UFO report, but it changes the question from folklore to reconstruction: what aircraft were present, where were they, and what else was happening in the airspace? [Airservices]airservicesaustralia.comAirservices Web TrakAirservices Web Trak
Sydney Air Corridors Create Both Evidence and Confusion
Sydney is not an empty sky. Sydney Airport has two north-south parallel runways and one east-west crossing runway, creating several standard traffic flows depending on wind and operational conditions. Airservices’ public flight-path material shows that inner suburbs can sit under arrivals and departures in both “south flow” and “north flow”, while noise monitors around places such as Sydenham, St Peters, Annandale, Leichhardt, Hunters Hill and Kurnell capture different runway patterns. [Aircraft Noise+2Aircraft Noise]aircraftnoise.airservicesaustralia.comAircraft Noise Sydney Airport flight pathsAircraft Noise Sydney Airport flight paths
That density matters for UFO interpretation. A witness may see aircraft lights converging, separating, appearing to hover on approach, or suddenly brightening as landing lights point towards the observer. From the cockpit, another aircraft or object may appear to move strangely if it is on a crossing track, if the observer’s own aircraft is turning, or if the sighting is close to the horizon. Around Sydney, ordinary aviation is not background noise; it is the environment in which many unusual reports are generated.
The Sydney Basin is also complicated by nearby aviation nodes. Airservices’ Sydney Basin reporting has described distinct flight patterns to and from Sydney, Bankstown and Camden airports, with circuit patterns and entry and exit lanes visible in track-density plots. The same report notes RAAF Richmond within the broader regional picture. This means a Sydney-area UFO report may involve airline traffic, training traffic, general aviation, helicopter operations, military movements, airport procedures or objects operating unlawfully in controlled airspace. [Airservices]airservicesaustralia.comAirservices Sydney Basin Aircraft Noise Information Report Quarter 1Airservices Sydney Basin Aircraft Noise Information Report Quarter 1
The result is a paradox. Busy airspace gives investigators more data, but it also gives observers more chances to see something they cannot immediately identify.
The 2010 Jerrabomberra Diversion Report
One of the most relevant New South Wales aviation-UFO reports is the 25 April 2010 incident near Mount Jerrabomberra, south of Canberra but within the NSW branch of this project. It is not a classic “flying saucer” story. It is more useful as a safety-and-records case because named commercial flights were reportedly diverted around an unidentified object.
Media accounts based on Airservices Australia material described an unidentified inverted-pyramid-shaped object hovering near the end of runway 35, initially moving west towards the runway end before rising and heading away. Two aircraft, identified as QFA814 and VOZ259, were reportedly diverted through noise-abatement areas to avoid the object. [News.com.au]news.com.auOpen source on com.au.
The strength of the case is not that the object was proved extraordinary. It is that the report, if accurately summarised from Airservices records, involved air traffic management action. A diversion or route adjustment gives the claim a practical footprint: controllers and crews were not merely discussing a light in the sky, but managing a possible hazard near controlled operations.
The weakness is equally important. Publicly available summaries do not provide a full technical package: no clear radar plot, no recovered object, no definitive operator, no detailed weather analysis and no final identification. The story therefore sits in a middle category. It is stronger than an unsupported anecdote because flight identifiers and operational response are reported; it is weaker than a resolved aviation investigation because the public evidence does not let readers independently reconstruct the event.
The 2012 South of Sydney Cylindrical Object
Another Sydney-route case appeared in reporting on Airservices material obtained by researchers Paul Dean and Keith Basterfield. In September 2012, flight TGW581 reportedly saw a red cylindrical object pass the aircraft in the opposite direction while the aircraft was climbing roughly 20 nautical miles south of Sydney. [Liputan6.com]liputan6.compilot australia saksikan penampakan misterius ufopilot australia saksikan penampakan misterius ufo
This is exactly the kind of report that attracts attention: a professional crew, a defined phase of flight, a location close to Sydney routes and a specific shape and colour. Yet it is also exactly the kind of report that must be handled cautiously. A red cylinder crossing an aircraft’s path could suggest a drone, balloon, rocket-like object, model aircraft, debris or another human-made object rather than anything exotic. The sighting’s evidential value depends on what else was logged: radar returns, other crew reports, ATC recordings, weather, notices to airmen, military activity, or later identification.
The public record does not appear to settle those questions. That makes the 2012 report useful not as a “best UFO case”, but as a demonstration of how pilot evidence can be simultaneously credible and incomplete. The crew may have accurately reported a real object, while investigators may still lack enough data to identify it.
The Older Benchmark: The 1954 Sea Fury Case
The best-known New South Wales pilot-radar case is not on a modern Sydney airline route, but it is essential background for judging pilot sighting evidence in the state. On 31 August 1954, Royal Australian Navy pilot Lieutenant J. A. O’Farrell was returning to the naval air station at Nowra in a Hawker Sea Fury after a night flight when he reported bright lights near his aircraft. According to the National Archives of Australia, O’Farrell described a vague shape with a white light centrally on top, radioed Nowra, and received confirmation that the unknown craft were registering on radar. [NAA]naa.gov.auflying saucers fact or fictionflying saucers fact or fiction
The case gained public attention after newspaper reporting in December 1954. Trove’s archived newspaper record summarises the story as involving two objects seen by O’Farrell while flying over Goulburn on a return trip to Nowra, with radar confirmation from Nowra. [Trove]trove.nla.gov.auOpen source on nla.gov.au.
Why does this matter for a Sydney air-routes page? Because it shows the older template against which later pilot reports are often judged: trained aircrew plus radar plus official record. It also shows the dangers of later embellishment. Specialist re-examinations of the Sea Fury incident note that some retellings became more dramatic than the original descriptions, while original wording was more restrained: vague shapes and lights, not sharply detailed alien craft. [project1947.com]project1947.comOpen source on project1947.com.
The Sea Fury case remains unresolved in the public record, but its lesson is clear. Pilot-radar cases deserve attention, yet the most reliable version is usually the least sensational one.
What Corroborating Records Add
A Sydney pilot sighting becomes more useful when it can be checked against independent records. The most important forms of corroboration are not dramatic photographs or anonymous online posts, but mundane operational data.
A strong case would ideally include:
- Time, position and altitude: enough detail to place the aircraft in Sydney’s arrival, departure or en-route structure.
- ATC recordings or controller notes: evidence of what was said in real time, before memory and media framing changed the story.
- Radar or surveillance data: not just “radar saw it”, but the type of return, track behaviour and whether it could have been another aircraft, clutter, weather or a transponder-equipped target.
- Weather and visibility: cloud, haze, wind, sun angle and darkness can transform ordinary lights into puzzling observations. The Bureau of Meteorology provides aviation weather observations, forecasts, warnings and advisories within the international aviation framework, which makes weather a basic part of any serious reconstruction. [Bureau of Meteorology]bom.gov.auOpen source on bom.gov.au.
- Known aircraft and drone constraints: CASA rules make it clear that drones over 250 grams must not be flown within 5.5 kilometres of a controlled airport, and all drones must stay clear of runway approach and departure paths; separate authorisations are required for operations above 120 metres, in controlled or restricted airspace, or in approach and departure paths. [Civil Aviation Safety Authority]casa.gov.auOpen source on casa.gov.au.
This is why pilot sightings are often stronger than casual sightings but still rarely decisive. They can be serious aviation-safety events even when they are not strong evidence for extraordinary technology. A drone, balloon or rocket-like object in the wrong place can be unidentified, dangerous and entirely human-made.
Why Sydney Sightings Are Hard to Interpret
The main doubt in Sydney air-route cases is not that pilots are unreliable. It is that the sky around Sydney contains many moving parts. Airline routes, training aircraft, helicopters, general aviation, changing runway flows, military activity, drones, balloons, fireworks, weather balloons, satellites, planets and atmospheric effects can all create brief puzzles.
There is also a reporting bias. Pilots are more likely than many members of the public to notice and report hazards because aviation safety depends on doing so. That means air routes naturally generate records of unusual objects, especially near airports and controlled airspace. More reports do not automatically mean more extraordinary events; they may simply mean more trained observers, more traffic and better reporting channels.
Modern records can also weaken a claim. If WebTrak, ATC logs, ADS-B data, weather and airport movement records show an ordinary aircraft, drone operation, balloon release or celestial object in the right place, a once-mysterious sighting becomes explainable. Conversely, if a report remains unexplained after those checks, that does not prove an exotic origin. It means the available evidence did not support a firm identification.
This distinction is central to New South Wales UFO history. The most valuable Sydney-area aviation cases are not the most colourful stories, but the ones that show how a sighting moves through real-world systems: cockpit observation, radio call, controller response, safety action, record search and later interpretation.
Are Pilot UFO Sightings Stronger Evidence?
Pilot UFO sightings can be stronger evidence, but only in a limited and practical sense. They are stronger when they come with known flight details, contemporaneous reporting, controller involvement, radar or surveillance data, and weather context. They are not automatically strong because a pilot was involved.
For Sydney and the wider New South Wales record, the most balanced judgement is this: aviation reports deserve more attention than ordinary anonymous sightings, but they should be treated as air-safety puzzles before they are treated as UFO mysteries. The 1954 Sea Fury case shows the enduring appeal of pilot-plus-radar evidence. The 2010 Jerrabomberra report shows how an unidentified object can affect aircraft routing. The 2012 south-of-Sydney cylindrical-object report shows how even a precise pilot observation may remain unresolved if the supporting records are thin.
That makes Sydney air routes important within the state’s UFO history for a grounded reason. They do not prove extraordinary craft in New South Wales skies. They show where unusual reports have the best chance of being tested — and where the difference between “unidentified”, “unresolved” and “extraordinary” matters most.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Are Pilot UFO Sightings Stronger Evidence?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience
Focuses on witness evaluation, case classification, and assessing testimony quality.
UFOs
Directly addresses the evidential value of pilot reports, radar cases, and official records.
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Examines investigative standards, aviation-related sightings, and official case handling.
Encounter in Rendlesham Forest
Illustrates how witness accounts become stronger when supported by records and multiple observers.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.
Endnotes
-
Source: atsb.gov.au
Link: https://www.atsb.gov.au/investigations/ao-2014-052 -
Source: news.com.au
Link: https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-advice/flights/mysterious-sightings-in-australias-skies/news-story/33f2ccd0d9ca866b1e9ccb400772e362 -
Source: liputan6.com
Title: pilot australia saksikan penampakan misterius ufo
Link: https://www.liputan6.com/global/read/2170838/pilot-australia-saksikan-penampakan-misterius-ufo -
Source: naa.gov.au
Title: flying saucers fact or fiction
Link: https://www.naa.gov.au/blog/flying-saucers-fact-or-fiction -
Source: project1947.com
Link: https://www.project1947.com/kbcat/sea_fury_1954.htm -
Source: aviation-safety.net
Link: https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/310449 -
Source: au.webtrak.aero
Title: aero Sydney
Link: https://au.webtrak.aero/syd3 -
Source: project1947.com
Link: https://www.project1947.com/links/index.htm -
Source: project1947.com
Title: SOUT H AUSTRALIAN UFO REPORTS LISTING
Link: https://www.project1947.com/kbcat/kbsaufo05-1.htm -
Source: airservicesaustralia.com
Title: Airservices Web Trak
Link: https://www.airservicesaustralia.com/community/environment/aircraft-noise/webtrak/ -
Source: aircraftnoise.airservicesaustralia.com
Title: Aircraft Noise Sydney Airport flight paths
Link: https://aircraftnoise.airservicesaustralia.com/2020/04/30/sydney-airport-flight-paths/ -
Source: aircraftnoise.airservicesaustralia.com
Title: Aircraft Noise Resources – Page 4
Link: https://aircraftnoise.airservicesaustralia.com/category/resources/page/4/ -
Source: aircraftnoise.airservicesaustralia.com
Link: https://aircraftnoise.airservicesaustralia.com/category/what-are-the-flight-paths-in-my-area/page/5/ -
Source: airservicesaustralia.com
Title: Airservices Sydney Basin Aircraft Noise Information Report Quarter 1
Link: https://www.airservicesaustralia.com/wp-content/uploads/Q1_2016_Sydney_Bankstown_Camden_ANIR-1.pdf -
Source: trove.nla.gov.au
Link: https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/96500678 -
Source: bom.gov.au
Link: https://www.bom.gov.au/aviation/ -
Source: casa.gov.au
Link: https://www.casa.gov.au/knowyourdrone/drone-rules -
Source: casa.gov.au
Title: flight approvals and permissions
Link: https://www.casa.gov.au/drones/flight-authorisations/flight-approvals-and-permissions -
Source: naa.gov.au
Link: https://www.naa.gov.au/students-and-teachers/student-research-portal/learning-resource-themes/war/defence-equipment-and-weapons/ufo-sightings-weapons-testing-site-woomera -
Source: naa.gov.au
Title: research guide the sinking of hmas sydney
Link: https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-06/research-guide-the-sinking-of-hmas-sydney.pdf -
Source: naa.gov.au
Link: https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-05/records-released-march-2021.pdf -
Source: naa.gov.au
Link: https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2019-10/Tune-review-MrNewellArmstrong.pdf -
Source: naa.gov.au
Title: research guide commonwealth government records about tas
Link: https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-06/research-guide-commonwealth-government-records-about-tas.pdf -
Source: naa.gov.au
Title: records released july 2021
Link: https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-09/records-released-july-2021.pdf
Published: july 2021 -
Source: naa.gov.au
Link: https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-06/records-released-may-2021.pdf -
Source: naa.gov.au
Link: https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-03/records-released-february-2021.pdf -
Source: naa.gov.au
Title: Research Guide
Link: https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-06/research-guide-allies-enemies-and-trading-partners_0.pdf -
Source: naa.gov.au
Title: research guide government records about ACT
Link: https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-06/research-guide-government-records-about-ACT.pdf -
Source: atsb.gov.au
Link: https://www.atsb.gov.au/sites/default/files/investigation-reports/AO-2014-052%20Final.pdf -
Source: atsb.gov.au
Title: Insert document title
Link: https://www.atsb.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/5204265/ab-2014-064_final.pdf -
Source: atsb.gov.au
Link: https://www.atsb.gov.au/aviation-investigation-reports?field_aircraft_manufacturer_target_id=All&field_aircraft_model_value=&field_aircraft_operation_type_target_id=All&field_aircraft_vehicle_sector_target_id=All&field_aviation_occurrence_type_target_id=All&field_completion_date_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_completion_date_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_damage_target_id=All&field_event_location_value=&field_highest_injury_level_target_id=All&field_investigation_status_target_id=All&field_investigation_type_target_id=All&field_mode_of_transport_target_id%5B0%5D%5Btarget_id%5D=1&field_occurence_date_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_occurence_date_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_occurrence_category_target_id=All&field_occurrence_date_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_occurrence_date_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_registration_value=&field_report_id_value=&field_report_release_date_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_report_release_date_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_report_status_target_id=All&field_state_target_id=All&order=field_report_release_date&page=53&sort=desc&title= -
Source: atsb.gov.au
Link: https://www.atsb.gov.au/investigations?page=110 -
Source: atsb.gov.au
Link: https://www.atsb.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/5743306/AR-2015-082%20FINAL.pdf -
Source: atsb.gov.au
Link: https://www.atsb.gov.au/aviation-investigation-reports?field_aircraft_manufacturer_target_id=All&field_aircraft_model_value=&field_aircraft_operation_type_target_id=All&field_aircraft_vehicle_sector_target_id=All&field_aviation_occurrence_type_target_id=All&field_completion_date_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_completion_date_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_damage_target_id=All&field_event_location_value=&field_highest_injury_level_target_id=All&field_investigation_status_target_id=All&field_investigation_type_target_id=All&field_occurence_date_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_occurence_date_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_occurrence_category_target_id=All&field_occurrence_date_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_occurrence_date_value%5Bmin%5D=2007&field_registration_value=&field_report_id_value=&field_report_release_date_value%5Bmax%5D=&field_report_release_date_value%5Bmin%5D=&field_report_status_target_id=All&field_state_target_id=All&order=field_occurence_date&page=52&sort=desc&title= -
Source: atsb.gov.au
Link: https://www.atsb.gov.au/investigations/ao-2014-164 -
Source: atsb.gov.au
Link: https://www.atsb.gov.au/taxonomy/term/358 -
Source: atsb.gov.au
Title: Insert document title
Link: https://www.atsb.gov.au/sites/default/files/media/5772518/aviation-short-investigation-bulletin-issue-58_finalreport.pdf -
Source: engage.airservicesaustralia.com
Link: https://engage.airservicesaustralia.com/96933/widgets/452915/documents/313088 -
Source: aircraftnoise.airservicesaustralia.com
Link: https://aircraftnoise.airservicesaustralia.com/category/resources/ -
Source: airservicesaustralia.com
Link: https://www.airservicesaustralia.com/community/environment/aircraft-noise/ -
Source: aircraftnoise.airservicesaustralia.com
Link: https://aircraftnoise.airservicesaustralia.com/category/what-are-the-flight-paths-in-my-area/page/6/ -
Source: airservicesaustralia.com
Link: https://www.airservicesaustralia.com/industry-info/unmanned-aerial-systems-in-controlled-airspace/ -
Source: westernsydneyairport.gov.au
Title: Flight paths
Link: https://www.westernsydneyairport.gov.au/flight-paths -
Source: courts.qld.gov.au
Title: cif march2014cabooltureplanecrash 20200310
Link: https://www.courts.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/642551/cif-march2014cabooltureplanecrash-20200310.pdf -
Source: casa.gov.au
Title: sydney airspace changes
Link: https://www.casa.gov.au/operations-safety-and-travel/airspace/sydney-airspace-changes -
Source: sydneyairport.com.au
Link: https://www.sydneyairport.com.au/corporate/sustainability/supporting-our-people-and-communities/aircraft-noise -
Source: aph.gov.au
Title: Document Store.ashx
Link: https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=fa57ff8b-6706-4560-a885-7025a58bfe0d&subId=755250 -
Source: aph.gov.au
Link: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Rural_and_Regional_Affairs_and_Transport/Drones/Report/c02 -
Source: sacf.infrastructure.gov.au
Link: https://sacf.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/guide-to-navigating-sydney-airport-operational-statistics-noise-information_may_2021.pdf -
Source: infrastructure.gov.au
Link: https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/infrastructure-transport-vehicles/aviation/airports/western-sydney-international-airport/western-sydney-international-airport-flight-paths -
Source: sacf.infrastructure.gov.au
Link: https://sacf.infrastructure.gov.au/aircraft-noise -
Source: wsiflightpaths.gov.au
Title: Western Sydney International Airport
Link: https://www.wsiflightpaths.gov.au/ -
Source: wsiflightpaths.gov.au
Link: https://www.wsiflightpaths.gov.au/pdf-documents/eis-documents/WSI_EIS_Chapter_8_-_Facilitated_changes.pdf -
Source: wsiflightpaths.gov.au
Title: Chapter 11 Aircraft noise
Link: https://www.wsiflightpaths.gov.au/pdf-documents/WSI_EIS_Chapter_11_Aircraft_noise.pdf -
Source: aviationcomplaints.gov.au
Link: https://www.aviationcomplaints.gov.au/aircraft-noise -
Source: bom.gov.au
Title: airport weather briefing
Link: https://www.bom.gov.au/aviation/forecasts/airport-weather-briefing/ -
Source: wollondilly.nsw.gov.au
Title: council responds to release of western sydney airport flight paths
Link: https://www.wollondilly.nsw.gov.au/home/latest-news/council-responds-to-release-of-western-sydney-airport-flight-paths
Additional References
-
Source: youtube.com
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YNiiywi2V8Source snippet
4 Former fighter pilot reveal UFO abnormalities leaves hosts in disbelief | Today Show Australia...
-
Source: youtube.com
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ6s2NmySbsSource snippet
3 The Reconstruction Conversation of Australian Pilot Frederick Valentich in 1978 - FindingUFO...
-
Source: youtube.com
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IP_78YyK7rgSource snippet
5 Australian Filmmaker Claims To Have New Evidence Of 1980 UFO Sighting | 10 News+...
-
Source: youtube.com
Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yFIRaalq10Source snippet
2 Inside the Australian UFO Archive: Tullamarine, Goulburn, and the Townsville Radar Case...
-
Source: faa.gov
Link: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/aim_html/chap7_section_1.html -
Source: war.gov
Link: https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/061226/release_03/documents/CIA-UAP-019-Australian_Dept_of_Defense_Scientific_and_Intel_Aspects_of_the_UFO_Problem.pdf -
Source: academia.edu
Link: https://www.academia.edu/38868449/Emniyet_Y%C3%B6netim_Sistemi -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/7NEWSQld/posts/60-years-ago-this-month-the-worlds-attention-turned-to-tully-in-far-north-queens/1302637121894911/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/7NEWSsydney/posts/a-mysterious-flying-object-seen-hovering-in-the-night-sky-had-many-people-wonder/5123956544295104/ -
Source: wmo.int
Link: https://wmo.int/activities/aircraft-based-observations/aircraft-based-observations
Topic Tree